Expand Composite Work Practice capacity and adjust default enablement - Increase Composite capacity

We’re hitting structural limits in Composite Work Practices that force workarounds and prevent accurate modelling of real operations.

Current constraints

• Only two Composite Work Practice Groups.

• Each group supports a maximum of three sub-items.

Operational impact

• The available composite fields are consumed by fundamentals (e.g., single- vs multi‑pilot, standby type).

• There’s no remaining capacity to capture critical context, such as:

  • Applicability by base status: Home Base vs Toured/Away Base

    • Note: Some teams treat “toured base” and “acclimatisation” separately; others couple them.

  • Crew acclimatisation state (acclimatised vs not acclimatised).

  • Extra conditions tied to specific deployments or client contracts.

Why this matters

• Certain client requirements can’t be enforced reliably within current limits.

• Applying these constraints only in the roster layer is insufficient when clients don’t use the roster.

• This needs to be solved inside the Work Practice configuration itself.

Request

• Increase Composite capacity:

  • Support more Composite Work Practice Groups (e.g., up to 4).

  • Allow more sub-items per group (e.g., 6–8).

• Outcome: Enables concurrent monitoring of Crew Composition, Standby, Acclimatisation, and Base applicability without conflicts.

Context

• This proposal forms part of the broader storyline documented in AM-I-857.